tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2867321763955747460.post8189305045968378682..comments2023-08-11T01:00:07.123-07:00Comments on 5:55 AM: That reminds me...Sandyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15559715601984648600noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2867321763955747460.post-81498723213455401412007-09-15T11:07:00.000-07:002007-09-15T11:07:00.000-07:00@dasch: Nevermind, I was totally wrong on my previ...@dasch: Nevermind, I was totally wrong on my previous comment. Thanks for the advice!Sandyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15559715601984648600noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2867321763955747460.post-15632851442509026892007-09-15T09:11:00.000-07:002007-09-15T09:11:00.000-07:00@dasch: Why would I want to work on a local branch...@dasch: Why would I want to work on a local branch instead? My commits still don't go up until I execute `bzr push`, right? Considering I'm the only committer, branching/etc just seems like extra steps.<BR/><BR/>Feel free to correct/educate me on this, though. :-)Sandyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15559715601984648600noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2867321763955747460.post-50428532351530167382007-09-15T08:56:00.000-07:002007-09-15T08:56:00.000-07:00You probably want to use "bzr branch http://www.gn...You probably want to use "bzr branch http://www.gnome.org/~sharm/svnservant" instead -- that will create a local branch, which you can later merge with the main branch.<BR/><BR/>Using "co" (or "checkout") will create what's called a "bound" branch, which means that each commit is propagated to the original branch (just like in Subversion.)daschhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08180445905619105913noreply@blogger.com